Reasoning
ISBT Reasoning for all banking PO,Clerk,IBPS PO,Railway,SSC,IAS,OAS Exams
| Q291. | 
 | 
| 1) | E | 2) | C | 
| 3) | A | 4) | Data inadequate | 
| 5) | None of these | ||
Answer : E 
 View Answer
 View Answer| Q292. | 
 | 
| 1) | H | 2) | E | 
| 3) | G | 4) | Data Inadequte | 
| 5) | None of these | ||
Answer : E 
 View Answer
 View Answer| Q293. | 
 | 
| 1) | FYOBOC | 2) | DEQJQM | 
| 3) | EDRIRL | 4) | DCQHQK | 
| 5) | None of these | ||
Answer : EDRIRL 
Explanation :
Explanation :
The first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth letters of th word are respectively moved two, three, four, five, six and seven steps forward to obtain the corresponding letters of the code.
So,CANDLE will be coded as EDRIRL.
 View Answer
 View Answer| Q294. | 
 | 
| 1) | OTAESNR | 2) | STAETNR | 
| 3) | ATAETNR | 4) | OTAETNR | 
| 5) | None of these | ||
Answer : OTAETNR 
Explanation :
Explanation :
In the given word, we can analyse that,
M is decreased by 1, M -1 = L, and other words are interchanged,
EN - NE
TI - IT
ON - NO
So, PATTERN will be
P -1 = O
AT - TA
TE - ET
RN - NR
 View Answer
 View Answer| Q295. | 
 | 
| 1) | CPNCBX | 2) | DPNCBX | 
| 3) | CPNCBZ | 4) | DPNCBZ | 
| 5) | None of these | ||
Answer : CPNCBZ 
Explanation :
Explanation :
Clearly every letter is increased by 1 as
M +1 N
A +1 B
D +1 E
R +1 S
A +1 B
S +1 T
So, after increasing every character in work BOMBAY by 1, we get
 View Answer
 View Answer| Q296. | 
 | 
| 1) | CALNCA | 2) | CBKNCA | 
| 3) | HAKNCA | 4) | CAKNCA | 
| 5) | None of these | ||
Answer : CAKNCA 
Explanation :
Explanation :
Each letter of the word is moved four step back to decode it.
So, GEORGE will be CAKNCA.
 View Answer
 View Answer| Q297. | 
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "Strong" arguments and "Weak" arguments in so far as they relate to the question. "Strong" arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. "Weak" arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Each of the following questions consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. Give answer: 1) If only argument I is strong 2) If only argument II is strong 3) If either I or II is strong 4) If neither I nor II is strong and 5) If both I and II are strong Statement : Should education be made compulsory for all children up to the age of 14 ? Arguments :  I. Yes. This will help to eradicate the system of forced employment of children.                      II. Yes. This would increase the standard of living. | 
| 1) | 1 | 2) | 2 | 
| 3) | 3 | 4) | 4 | 
| 5) | 5 | ||
Answer : 4 
Explanation :
Explanation :
None of the arguments is valid.
 View Answer
 View Answer| Q298. | 
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "Strong" arguments and "Weak" arguments in so far as they relate to the question. "Strong" arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. "Weak" arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Each of the following questions consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. Give answer: 1) If only argument I is strong 2) If only argument II is strong 3) If either I or II is strong 4) If neither I nor II is strong and 5) If both I and II are strong Statement : Should government stop spending huge amounts of money on international sports ?  Arguments : I. Yes. This money can be utilised for poor.                      II. No. Sports-persons will be frustrated and will not get international exposure. | 
| 1) | 1 | 2) | 2 | 
| 3) | 3 | 4) | 4 | 
| 5) | 5 | ||
Answer : 2 
Explanation :
Explanation :
Clearly spending money on sports can not be avoided merely for social economic problems. 
But Argument II is strong. Be a sports man and then think on this question. 
 View Answer
 View Answer| Q299. | 
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "Strong" arguments and "Weak" arguments in so far as they relate to the question. "Strong" arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. "Weak" arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Each of the following questions consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. Give answer: 1) If only argument I is strong 2) If only argument II is strong 3) If either I or II is strong 4) If neither I nor II is strong and 5) If both I and II are strong Statement : Should there be reservation of seats and posts on communal basis ? Arguments : I. Yes. It will check most of the inter-communal biases.                     II. No. Ours is a secular state. | 
| 1) | 1 | 2) | 2 | 
| 3) | 3 | 4) | 4 | 
| 5) | 5 | ||
Answer : 2 
 View Answer
 View Answer| Q300. | 
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "Strong" arguments and "Weak" arguments in so far as they relate to the question. "Strong" arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. "Weak" arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Each of the following questions consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. Give answer: 1) If only argument I is strong 2) If only argument II is strong 3) If either I or II is strong 4) If neither I nor II is strong and 5) If both I and II are strong. Statement : Should number of holidays of government employees be reduced ? Arguments : I. Yes. Our government employees are | 
| 1) | 1 | 2) | 2 | 
| 3) | 3 | 4) | 4 | 
| 5) | 5 | ||
Answer : 2 
 View Answer
 View Answer
